Jul 082010
 
FacebookShare

The chemtrail conspiracy theory holds that some contrails are actually chemical or biological agents deliberately sprayed at high altitude in a non-disclosed to the public. Versions of the chemtrail conspiracy theory circulating on the Internet and talk radio shows theorize that the activity is directed by government officials. Consequently, federal agencies have received thousands of complaints from people who have asked for an explanation. The existence of chemtrails has been repeatedly denied by government agencies and scientists around the world.

The United States Air Force said that the theory is a hoax “was discussed and refuted by many established and accredited universities, scientific organizations, and major media publications. The UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said that chemtrails “are not scientifically accepted phenomena. The Canadian Government Leader in the House of Commons said that “The term chemtrails” is a term popularized, and there is no scientific evidence to support their existence. ”

Chemtrails term is derived from “chemical trail” in the same way that drag is an abbreviation of condensation trail. It does not refer to common forms of aerial spraying of crops such as dusting, cloud seeding or aerial control cons. The term specifically refers to aerial trails that have been caused by the systematic high altitude of chemicals does not appear in ordinary contrails, resulting in the emergence of so-called unusual sky tracks. Believers of this theory assumes that the purpose of the chemical release may be global dimming, population control, weather control, or biological warfare and calls for these tracks are the cause of respiratory diseases and other health problems.

Overview
The Chemtrail conspiracy theory began circulating in 1996 when the United States Air Force (USAF) has been accused of “projection of the population of the United States with mysterious substances” from the plane “models generate unusual drag” . The Air Force maintains that these accusations were a hoax fueled in part by quoting a strategy document prepared in the Air Force Air University entitled Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025. The document was submitted in response to a military directive to outline a strategic future weather modification system in order to maintain U.S. military dominance in the year 2025, and identified as “fictional representations of future situations and scenarios” . The Air Force said the paper does not reflect the current policy of military practice, the “ability or, and that it” is not required of all time modification experiments or programs and n ‘ has no intention of doing so in the future. “Additionally, the Air Force says the hoax” chemtrails “was discussed and refuted by many established and accredited universities, scientific organizations and major media publications “.

In Britain, where the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs has asked “what research his Department has undertaken on the polluting effects of chemtrails for aircraft”, the answer was that “the department is not researching the chemtrail planes as they are not scientifically recognized phenomena, but that work was ongoing to understand how streaks can influence climate today and anticipate the future impacts that may result from the increased air traffic.

In response to a petition filed by concerned Canadian citizens regarding “the chemicals used in aerial spraying affect the health of Canadians, the Government House Leader responded by stating that” There is no substantiated evidence , scientific or otherwise, to support the allegation that it is high altitude spraying conducted in Canadian airspace. chemtrails The term “is a term popularized, and there is no scientific evidence to support their existence. “The House leader goes on to say that” it is our belief that the petitioners are to see the contrails of aircraft regular or streaks.

Different versions of the chemtrail conspiracy theory circulated through Internet sites and radio programs. In some accounts, the chemicals are described as barium and aluminum salts, polymer fibers, thorium or silicon carbide. In other accounts, it is alleged that the sky is stocked with materials that conduct electricity through an extensive program of electromagnetic super weapons around the High Frequency Active Aurora Research Program (HAARP). Those who believe in conspiracy chemtrails say are toxic, but the reasons cited by those who believe in the conspiracy are highly variable, ranging from the testing of military weapons, chemical population control, mitigation of global warming. Scientists and federal agencies have always denied that chemtrails exist, focusing on the slopes of heaven are simply persistent contrails. As the theory of propagation chemtrail conspiracy, federal officials have been inundated with calls and letters from angry. A multi-agency response to dispel rumors was published in 2000 as a sheet by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA believers), a step chemtrail many have interpreted as further evidence of the existence of a government cover-up.

Proponents of the theory that chemtrails chemtrail can be distinguished by their long trails of life, saying that chemtrails are those who persist skytrack provided a half day or transform into cirrus-like. However, some trails are visible for several hours after the event trails, a publication of the USAF. Air Force officials say that the long trails from certain weather conditions, and duration and rate of dissipation can be accurately predicted when the humidity level and temperature are known.

Chemtrails vs. Contrails
According to a piece United States Air Force is drag, drag or condensation trails are “streaks of condensed water vapor in the air created by an airplane or rocket at high altitude.” These tracks are the result of condensation of normal emissions of water vapor from piston engines and jet engines at high altitude where water vapor condenses into a visible cloud. Contrails form when hot humid air from the burn engines, and are cooled by air cooler. (The blend is the result of turbulence generated by the engine jet exhaust). The speed at which contrails dissipate is entirely dependent on weather and altitude. If the atmosphere is near saturation, the trail may exist for some time. Conversely, if the atmosphere is dry, the trail dissipates quickly.

Chemtrails, from “chemical trails” in the same way that contrails just “vapor trail” is a term coined to suggest that contrails are formed by something other than a natural process of exhaust knocking cold air in the atmosphere. conspiricists Chemtrail characterize the chemical trails that streams that persist for hours, and their interplay, grid-like models, or parallel bands which eventually merge to form large clouds. Supporters consider the presence of visible color spectra in streams, unusual concentrations of sky tracks in a single space, or trails left by aircraft or persistent unmarked military flight altitudes or atypical sites as markers of chemtrails .

Government agencies and experts on atmospheric phenomena to deny the existence of chemtrails, claiming that the characteristics attributed to them are simply characteristics of trails in different ways under different conditions in terms of sunlight, temperature, wind shear horizontal and vertical, and the moisture present in the aircraft altitude. The experts explain what appears like motifs such as grids formed by contrails resulting from increases in air traffic traveling through the grid as the U.S. national airspace system north-south and east-west flight paths oriented, and it is difficult for observers to judge the differences in altitudes between these streaks on the ground. The fact sheet issued jointly produced by NASA, EPA, FAA, and NOAA in 2000 in response to alarms about chemtrails details of the science of the formation of contrails, and describes both known and potential impacts have streaks on the temperature and climate. The USAF has produced an information sheet describes these phenomena as well as streaks observed and analyzed since at least 1953. He also refuted the theories more directly by identifying chemtrail theory as a hoax and denying the existence of chemtrails.

Patrick Minnis, an atmospheric scientist with the Center for NASA Langley Research in Hampton, Virginia, is quoted in USA Today saying that logic is not exactly a selling point for proponents of most chemtrails “If you try to pin these people down and refute things, it:” Well, you’re just a part of the conspiracy, “he said [2].

In 2001, the U.S. Congress Dennis Kucinich has introduced legislation that would permanently prohibited the basing of weapons in space, and cited as one of chemtrails a number of exotic weapons that would prohibited. [25 promoters] have claimed that because of explicit reference to Chemtrails was made by Congressman Kucinich in the Congressional Record, which is the government’s official recognition of their existence. The bill received a negative evaluation of the Department of Defense and died in committee, not to mention chemtrails appear in the text of one of the following three unsuccessful attempts by Kucinich to enact a law on the protection space.

X-Pattern Contrail

X-Pattern Contrail

FacebookShare
Mar 312010
 
FacebookShare

HAARP Conspiracy

  1. it was created in 1997, back when global warming didn’t exist, and nobody cared about the environment. A tradition we keep to this day.
  2. There are only two facts here.
  3. $30 million has been invested into the project since itstarted. That’s 3 billion 1p sweets. Which would you rather have?

The science behind it

The problem with us humans, is that no matter what we create, it’ll eventually be used for one of two things; war, or boning. Unfortunately the weather provides no sexual stimulation, so this leaves the former.

Project HAARP = High-frequency Active Auroral Research

The name of this ‘research’ is a bullshit name protecting it’s potential to be worse than a nuclear bomb. It can be used to create a sci-fi type world war, thus pretty much ending the human race as we know it.

How could this be done?

By raping the sky with energy rays from large amounts of antennas placed at HAARP’s location in Alaska. These rays of energy could then potentially be reflected back into the Earth’s ionosphere on an extremely low frequency, called ELF waves, which will seriously mess up your stuff. This can change the ELF waves to an extremely dangerous weapon.

The ELF waves are capable of penetrating your own god damn brain. Put your cell phone on vibrate. Now put it to your head. Times this force by at least a million. You have just experienced the potential of HAARP. On top of this, the vibrations could influence brain activity. I.E they could brainwash you. And make you do anythng. See that ugly chick across the bar? Do you want to have sex with her? No? Well you might have to one day. This could not only paralyze you completely, but could cause you to go insane. These waves can also make their way through concrete walls and steel.

The conspiracy

These low frequencies improve radio contact between people, even if you’re inside a thick concrete bunker or a submarine. The military might be able to prank call the korean subs with ease, locate missiles and detect bunkers created by the ‘enemy’ but I highly doubt this is worth paralyzing anyone who is between the wave and the wave’s destination. That’s like them firing missiles at each other with you being completely immobile in between them.

It can also block signals from any electronic device, which would mean you could stop anyone, anywhere from communicating electronically. Which would stop Koreans from gold mining in MMORPGS, and make it so they have to communicate via carrying pigeon, but they could also do it to you. Or your mother.

The pros of this project are good, but at no point outweight the terrifying cons of it’s technology.

To this day, nobody completely understands how the ionoshpere will react to being anally raped by energy rays. Remember the large hardon (see what I did there?) collider, and how they’re throwing atoms at each other just to see what will happen? This is basically it, except there’s no 50 million to one chance of something bad happening. The odds are far, far less. Together with the ozone layer, the ionosphere protects the us from being fried by the sun. We’re being so pissy about global warming destroying the ozone layer (VERY, VERY slowly) this could destroy the ionosphere in seconds.

The military will obviously refuse to acknowledge this, as overcompensating for a small penis by controlling the weather to win at war is far more important than the Earth’s safety. They’ll just assume nothing is going to happen.

Despite warnings and protests, it’s going agead anyway. They’re pouring $30 million dollars into it. 60 antennas are being tested already. Searching project HAARP into youtube will show you footage that proves something is going on.

how haarp works

how haarp works

FacebookShare